What it does
Every reading carries a signed receipt the consumer can verify
Rejects stale, tampered or unsigned data outright
Lock-in amplification cancels common-mode noise
Coherence-protection filter rejects single-sample glitches
Features — built vs lab
●Signed-receipt verification (unsigned/stale/tampered rejected)
●Lock-in differential amplification
●Coherence-protected median filtering
●Battery management can consume the trusted reading directly
○Real-sensor calibration + hardware qualification
How it compares to the giants
| Capability | Typical | Aumtrix |
|---|---|---|
| Signed sensor provenance | no | yes |
| Replay / tamper rejection | rare | yes |
| Noise cancellation in-sensor | basic | lock-in |
| Fail-safe by default (opens on any doubt) | varies | always |
| Signed, tamper-evident health record | no | yes |
| Predictive thermal-runaway warning | some | yes |
| Self-healing — rebuilds a failed sensor from peers | rare | yes |
| One sovereign core across every application | per-vendor | one core |
| On-device carbon-saving ledger | no | yes |
| Zero third-party dependency | no | yes |
How it works
01
Sense
The sensor reads temperature and applies lock-in amplification to pull the true signal out of noise.
02
Sign
Each reading is wrapped in a cryptographically signed receipt with a timestamp.
03
Verify
The consumer checks the signature and freshness, rejecting anything stale or tampered.
04
Act
Only trusted readings are passed to the battery management safety loop.
Live status
system● operational
safety statefail-safe by design
powered by.aum
Specs
Module: Q-SEP
Trust: signed receipts
State: built + deployed
Work with us
Honest note: features marked ● are built + tested today; ○ are the lab / certification phase (real-cell validation, accredited certification). We don't claim lab results we haven't earned.
Related in Sensing